Reserve the next Galaxy, Get a $50 Samsung Credit. New deals, S25 Ultra, Watch Ultra.
Last updated: September 14th, 2020 at 13:34 UTC+02:00
SamMobile has affiliate and sponsored partnerships, we may earn a commission.
Reading time: 2 minutes
UFC-Que Choisir described Samsung's insistence on the ethical foundation of its business as an example of “persistent malpractice” which violates the public trust it enjoys. It dubbed the purported transgressions as “fairwashing” of the company's image.
Besides allegations of child labor at cobalt mines in Congo, the lawsuit mentions long-time suspicions of forced labor in China and toxic chemical exposure incidents in South Korea as examples of ethically unacceptable business practices Samsung continues to turn a blind eye toward, citing reports from Amnesty International, UNICEF and China Labor Watch, among others. The issues stemming from questionable supplier business practices are exacerbated by the ongoing global pandemic which presents a huge threat to human lives in such poor working conditions, according to the group. Ultimately, the lawsuit's stated aim is to force Samsung into putting its stated principles into practice.
Human rights advocacy organizations ActionAid France and Sherpa filed a similar lawsuit against Samsung in July of 2019. That case is still ongoing and will likely take numerous more years to be resolved. Samsung doesn't practice commenting on ongoing litigation proceedings.
Trending
We'd like to show you notifications for the latest important news and updates