X

Phones

Specs comparison: Samsung Exynos 9810 vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845

Samsung officially unveiled its new flagship mobile processor today, the Exynos 9810. This is the first proper Exynos 9 series SoC. Samsung classified the Galaxy S8’s Exynos 8895 as a 9 series chip even though its model number was 8895. The Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9+ will be the first handsets to be powered by this new processor.

We also know that in markets like the United States, Samsung’s new flagship smartphones will be powered by the Qualcomm Snpadragon 845 processor which has already been unveiled. Both chips are quite identical which is why a specs comparison becomes necessary.

Samsung Exynos 9810 vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845

The Exynos 9810 and Snapdragon 845 are both built on Samsung’s second-generation 10nm FinFET LPP process. They also feature octa-core CPUs, Gigabit LTE modems, dual-ISPs, Bluetooth 5.0 and support for 4K screens. Aside from improved efficiency for AR and VR applications, the new chips also promise enhanced machine learning and artificial intelligence capabilities.

The comparison table below lists the similarities and differences between these two chipsets in detail. Samsung is yet to reveal the full CPU parameters of the Exynos 9810 so some information is still missing.

Exynos 9810Snapdragon 845
Process2nd Gen 10nm FinFET2nd Gen 10nm FinFET
CPU CoresOcta-Core, 64-bitOcta-Core, 64-bit
CPU4 x 2.9GHz Exynos M3 + 4 x 1.9GHz Cortex-A554 x 2.8GHz Kryo 385 + 4 x 1.7GHz Kryo 385
GPUARM Mali-G72 MP18Adreno 630
Display Resolution4K UHD (4096 x 2160) or WQUXGA (3840 x 2400) 60FPS4K UHD (4096 x 2160) 60FPS
Graphics API SupportOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 11, RenderscriptOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Renderscript
RAMLPDDR4XLPDDR4X Quad-channel 16-bit 1866 MHz
StorageUFS 2.1, & SD 3.0UFS 2.1, & SD 3.0
ISPDual ISPDual ISP
Camera24MP Single, 16MP+16MP Dual32MP Single, 16MP Dual
Video RecordingUp to 4K @ 120FPSUp to 4K @ 60FPS
Video Playback & CodecsMFC, Up to 4K @ 120FPS; 10-bit HEVC (H.265), H.264, VP9Up to 4K @ 60FPS; 10bit HDR, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP9
AudioUnknown chip with 32bit/384kHz qualityQualcomm Aqstic, Qualcomm aptX HD with 384kHz/32bit quality
ModemLTE Cat. 18 6CA 1.2Gbps Download; LTE Cat. 18 2CA 200 Mbps UploadX20 LTE Cat. 18 1.2Gbps Download; LTE Cat. 13 150Mbps Upload
Wi-FiDual-Band Wi-Fi ac/b/g/n with MU-MIMOWi-Fi ad, Multi-gigabit Wi-Fi ac/b/g/n with MU-MIMO
Bluetooth

5.0

5.0

Global PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BeiDouGPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS
SecuritySamsung KNOX, Security Processing Unit, DRAM encryptionQualcomm Secure Processing Unit, Qualcomm Processor Security, Qualcomm Mobile Security
ChargingSamsung Adaptive Fast Charge, Fast Wireless Charging (Qi & PMA)Quick Charge 4+ (USB PD Compatible)

It’s difficult to say which chip is going to be better based on specifications alone. The performance that you and I will experience on the Galaxy S9 depends on a variety of factors. Samsung has a habit of optimizing the Exynos variants of Galaxy flagships better than the Snapdragon variants so we hope that the Snapdragon-powered versions of the Galaxy S9 will be equal in terms of performance to their Exynos counterparts.

    13 Comments

    Sign in »

    13
    Leave a Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Lucidfer
    Lucidfer

    Exynos is an horrendous pile of shit (well except for video recording at 120fps which they won’t do). We ordered 4 GS8, and realise we were ordering from France therefor getting those crap Exynos version, and sure enough we were blasted with bloatware, crap video, screen and VR performance, so we returned them. Don’t know if I’m ordering a US snapdragon version or just abandoning the Galaxy S idea give there’s no new release in 2018 and all the horrible privacy violation that I’m surprised nobody has sued them for.

    BorrowedTime
    BorrowedTime

    I had Exynos devices for a long time and never had any problems

    friss
    friss

    Well Galaxy S9 / S9+ will have minor physical changes, something like Apple “S” cycle upgrade.

    paulmadrid
    paulmadrid

    exynos gpu mali sucks

    gyxter
    gyxter

    But still some 3d games will be slow with exynos. 🙁

    paulmadrid
    paulmadrid

    well snapdragon win. the gpu is adreno most of best game compatible to it. . exynos is great but the gpu not good on s8 mali gpu not working on modern combat 4 pink graphic error to make it work u need root then gl tool change it to adreno gpu. that sucks for mali . i hope they change it to power vr like iphone uses

    DeviceManager
    DeviceManager

    To be honest, does it really matter? It’s not like we’re givin an option at time of purchase. One part of there world or market uses Exynos and the other uses Snapdragon, so why even run the fact of the device, we cannot get unless you search for it and it comes from another part of the world (sometimes with dual SIMs)…

    antonmassoud
    antonmassoud

    Will the Exynos model be limited to 60fps at 4K to match with the Snapdragon??

    o0MHJ0o
    o0MHJ0o

    seriously, I will not be paying £900+ for still only QC 2. Need at least Quick Charge 4.0,
    and what about the rumours of dual stereo AKG speakers, that not happening anymore?

    UO88
    UO88

    This is not about specific phones, but a comparison of what the processors are capable of. The S9 will probably have those things.

    Biransahin
    Biransahin

    That’s a different subject.. This article is about the chip capabilities.. Nothing to do with the phone.

    Bobbingalong
    Bobbingalong

    Looking at the leaks pics, the s9 will have same design of the s8 with minor changes to the back on the camera and FPS scanner.

    Given the current leaks and spec information, I don’t have high hopes for stereo speakers or any thing substaintial that makes it stand out over an s8.

    gtone339
    gtone339

    Saving that feature for the Note 9 instead?