[Poll Results] Which Galaxy S flagship do you think was the ugliest?

The Galaxy S5, with the dotted texture on its back, is what many remember as the reason for Samsung finally moving on to the metal and glass design that debuted on the Galaxy S6 (anyone remember the blue S5?). But it was perhaps the “designed for humans” design of the Galaxy S III that got things going downhill. The S III was a result of Samsung trying to move away from an iPhone-like design; Samsung probably didn't care about anything but getting Apple off its back, which was probably the reason why the S III was so visually unappealing.

The S III's design wasn't phased out; it was refined continuously until we got the Galaxy S7 last year. But what kept everyone so interested was the new dual-edge screen that was introduced with the Galaxy S6 edge, and now, with the Galaxy S8, Samsung is once again pushing the boundaries of smartphone design. In fact, the new S8 and S8+ are so beautiful that it got us wondering what device our readers think was the ugliest of all Galaxy S flagships.

Was it the human-friendly Galaxy S III, or the Galaxy S5 with its ergonomic yet hard-on-the-eye perforated back? Or maybe you think the S III and S5 were beautiful and it was Samsung's iPhone-y design of the original Galaxy S and the Galaxy S II that was the worst of the lot? Well, let us know your opinion by leaving a comment, and by voting in the poll below.

Results: As we were expecting, the Galaxy S5 gets the maximum votes for ugliest Galaxy S flagship. Right below it is the Galaxy S III, which isn't surprising either. Thankfully, Samsung has now moved on to smartphone design that is perhaps the best in the industry, so we can safely put their not-so-impressive designs in the past, where they belong.