SamMobile has affiliate and sponsored partnerships. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Samsung’s arguments against Apple find some support at the Supreme Court


Last updated: October 12th, 2016 at 05:15 UTC+02:00

Samsung and Apple’s Supreme Court showdown started yesterday, the apex court of the United States is hearing its first design patent case in more than a century so its ruling will definitely be considered as landmark. This is the biggest patent dispute between these companies in which Samsung was initially hit with $1 billion in damages. The company has challenged the way damages are calculated and argues that Apple should not be entitled to all of the profits from an infringing device. Both sides made hour-long oral arguments in the Supreme Court yesterday.

Reports reveal that during the arguments various examples from wallpaper to the Volkswagen Beetle came up and most justices seemed to back Samsung’s argument that the lower court allowed a more expansive interpretation of the patent law which resulted in expensive damages for the company. Justice Samuel Alito reportedly remarked at one stage that “Nobody buys a car, even a Beetle, just because they like the way it looks,” while Chief Justice John Roberts pointed out that Apple’s iPhone design only applies to the exterior of the device and not “all the chips and wires.”

Several justices also remarked that juries might find it hard or even impossible to determine damages when only one part of the product’s design is infringing on a patent. Some hold on to the view that a distinctive design can account for a large percentage of the profit which suggests that Samsung is not likely going to sail to a victory here if the Supreme Court decided to send the matter back to a lower court for resolution.

It was ruled by a jury in 2012 that Samsung infringed on three iPhone design patents held by Apple which cover smartphones with a rectangular shape, curved corners and 16 colorful circles on a black screen. Samsung’s lawyer made an argument that “A smartphone is smart because it contains hundreds of thousands of the technologies that make it work, which then led to a debate on products that are reliant for their sales and profit on design only. It was reasoned that a car’s cup holder wouldn’t apply to the car’s overall value but if a wallpaper is copied, “you get the whole thing,” remarked Justice Stephen Breyer.

Apple’s side argued that the design patent secures “the thing to which the design is applied” which is an entire smartphone, in this case, adding that “design is not a component.” Justice Elena Kagan seemed to support the argument, pointing to the Volkswagen Beetle’s design as an example of “the thing that makes the product distinctive,” even though she acknowledged that “the car has to run, and it has to do all the other things that cars do.”

Samsung and Apple have now had their first day at the apex court, there will be more. Arguments will continue for a considerable period of time as a ruling is not expected before the end of the court’s term in June next year.

Via General Apple vs Samsunglawsuitspatents
Load 3 comments

You might also like

Samsung to be investigated by USITC over possible patent infringement

The US International Trade Commission is opening a probe into some of the biggest tech companies on the planet and Samsung is also on the list. The commission voted to start an investigation into certain capacitive touch-controlled devices and components. It has started this investigation based on a complaint from Neodron, an Ireland-based company that […]

  • By Adnan Farooqui
  • 2 years ago

Samsung remains the top patent filer in the US for the second year

Tech companies work on products that they may or may not release many years down the line. What’s more important for them is to obtain patents on their inventions so that they’re covered in the event they ever decide to launch a new product. Samsung files for and is granted thousands of patents every year […]

  • By Adnan Farooqui
  • 3 years ago

Samsung and Huawei settle their patent disputes in China

Samsung and Huawei have been involved in a fierce legal battle for many years now. They have sued each other in dozens of patent infringement cases both in China and the US. Earlier this year, the two companies decided to settle their lawsuits in the US, and it appears they have decided to opt for […]

  • By Naresh
  • 3 years ago

Galaxy Note S Pen with a camera? Probably not happening

You may have seen a couple of reports today about Samsung possibly integrating a camera into the S Pen. Some believe that this is another solution from the company for completely notch and hole-free smartphones. These reports are based on a patent recently granted by the USPTO after Samsung filed for it in February 2017. […]

  • By Adnan Farooqui
  • 3 years ago

Samsung’s new patent envisions a way for braille input on smartwatches

Samsung files hundreds of patent applications every year across the world. While most of them are very technical whose use cases may not be immediately apparent, some are relatively simple with a fairly obvious use case. Samsung’s ‘Electronic apparatus for inputting braille and operating method thereof’ patent filed in South Korea in March last year […]

  • By Naresh
  • 4 years ago

Samsung has a patent for a self-healing glass coating

A patent Samsung filed back in February last year has surfaced recently revealing that the company has worked on developing a self-healing oleophobic coating to be applied on the cover glass of mobile devices. This patent application from last year has been published this month by the World Intellectual Property Organization. The coating is described […]

  • By Adnan Farooqui
  • 4 years ago