Phone

Samsung Galaxy Note 4 appears in benchmark in Exynos (SM-N910C) and Snapdragon (SM-N910S) flavors

With the Galaxy S5 Prime turning out to be nothing but the Galaxy S5 LTE-A exclusively for South Korea, the Galaxy Note 4 is the next big thing we are all looking forward to. We recently published exclusive information on Samsung’s next phablet with details on its display and processor, and now, the device has showed up in the AnTuTu benchmark database in both its Snapdragon and Exynos flavors. The benchmark listings give away most of the specs of the Galaxy Note 4, and as we have expected, are as top-of-the-line as previous handsets in the Galaxy Note series have been.

The two variants on AnTuTu carry model numbers SM-N910C and SM-N910S, with the former powered by the Exynos 5433 processor (which we confirmed would be the chip debuting on the Note 4) and the latter by a Snapdragon 805 processor (clocked at 2.5GHz like the Galaxy S5 LTE-A.) The display resolution is 2560×1440 (while the screen size is expected to be 5.7-inches), and other specs listed include 3GB of RAM, 32GB of internal storage, a 16-megapixel camera, and Android 4.4.3.

note-4-antutu-2

The front-facing camera seems to have gotten a nice upgrade to a 3.6-megapixel unit, though it remains to be seen if that’s actually the resolution on the final product (with devices like the HTC One M8 sporting a 5-megapixel front-facing camera, it wouldn’t be surprising if Samsung is also looking at increasing the megapixel count for selfies.)

Overall, none of these specs are surprising, and will combine to make the Galaxy Note 4 among the most powerful Android handsets. Rumor has it that at least one variant will sport a flexible display (but will be exclusive to select markets), and a new design is expected as well, though considering the number of times rumors of a new design on Samsung’s smartphones have burned us by not turning out to be true, it would be best to take everything with a pinch of salt until some solid info comes along.

note-4-antutu

Via | Source

Join the Discussion