Posted by Abhijeet M. 1 year ago

Apple asked Samsung to pay $30-$40 per device, sign “anti-cloning” agreement to settle patent dispute


Follow: Phones
samsung-vs-apple23

Samsung and Apple have been embroiled in legal disputes for quite some time now, and while there have been attempts to settle the matter peacefully, Korea Times is reporting that negotiations have skidded to a halt lately because of Apple’s draconian demands from the Korean manufacturer.

According to “sources familiar with the matter,” Samsung was looking to enter a cross-licensing deal with Apple, but the latter demanded $30 per phone and $40 per tablet as part of that deal, which is quite a high number any way you look at it (HTC pays less $5 per device in comparison) – for the Galaxy S4 alone, which has sold more than 20 million, Samsung would have to shell out $600 million to the Cupertino giant.

Apple loves charging 30-40 percent extra (read: overcharge) for all their products, and it seems they wanted to apply the same strategy to the deal with Samsung. Furthermore, according to Florian Mueller of Foss Patents, Apple also wanted Samsung to sign an “anti-cloning” agreement which would prevent them from copying any of Apple’s products in the future.

So, with such high and mighty demands from Apple, it isn’t surprising that Samsung has refrained from furthering any such talks. Rumors say Apple has signed on to obtain iPhone chips in 2015 from the Korean manufacturer despite breaking up in the past, and we’ll hope they can find a suitable solution to stop all this legal madness as well.

Source

Related Posts:

3 comments on “Apple asked Samsung to pay $30-$40 per device, sign “anti-cloning” agreement to settle patent dispute

  1. mohdaamer 1 year ago said:

    Samsung shitty crappy company forgoted its premium tab 7.7 after 4 months of its annoucement

    Report this comment

  2. vbx 1 year ago said:

    “for the Galaxy S4 alone, which has sold more than 20 million, Samsung would have to shell out $600 million to the Cupertino giant.”

    Why would Samsung have to pay Apple a licensing fee for the S4? What about the S4 is owned or protected by Apple?

    Is it the SuperAmoled Screen? Is it the Exnos CPU? The removable battery? The micro SD card? The cheap plastic construction?

    I don’t get it. I hope Apple files for chapter 13 real soon and disappears from the face of the planet. The world would be so much better w/o this Company harassing everyone.

    Apple only became popular after they COPIED the LG Prada.

    Report this comment

    • jboogie1289 1 year ago said:

      CrApple is nearly in an out of control tail spin headed down NOSE FIRST! They’ve seen their customer base drop over the past few years and their prodcut demand is slowly shifting away. So this is their way to compensate? Losers! They see what the consumers are going for nowadays and what the other OEMS’s are putting out after listening to their customers. Geez CrApple, die already you leeches!

      Report this comment

Leave a Reply






SamMobile
© 2014 SamMobile.com  |  About us  |  Contact  |  Privacy & Cookies  |  Find us on Facebook, Google+ and Twitter.
Partners: Androidworld.nl
Close